BEPs Research Navigation
Audience Description:
Teachers are: professionals who provide a structured education experience for youth at the elementary and secondary education levels
Study-Specific BEPs
These study-specific Best Education Practices distill findings derived from the studies listed in the References below, which were identified using a meta-analysis technique.
Outreach Themes: BEPs are described by one or more of seven focus areas.
Outreach Themes |
Research Recommendations |
---|---|
The Audience |
Recognize that issues and context for different geographic regions impact educator and natural resource manager priorities for the relative importance of selected concepts, skills, and values. Tie water and water resource education to local values and needs of:
Determine whether teachers can implement topics. Check if:
Understand the roots of the environmental management problem and select your target audience based on a specific need. For example, if economic activity is most closely associated with the environmental problem, outreach initiatives should relate to the needs and interests of the target audience engaged in the economic activity. |
Message content |
Water and water resource education has a distinct body of knowledge described by topics categorized as concepts, skills, and values or emotions. Water science and management knowledge has been organized by Brody (1995) and others. |
Message delivery vehicle |
Develop, promote, and/or disseminate pre-developed materials, hands-on activities and grade level appropriate software about priority water topics. |
Outreach strategy |
Educate teachers about innovations in curricula to ensure that they are implemented. Encourage and support use of a community-based curriculum based on water monitoring. (This type of curriculum has been shown to be highly acceptable among teachers and to provide professional satisfaction.) Encourage teachers to include the following elements in their environmental education programs:
|
Public participation |
No research available |
Supporting and motivating professionals |
Provide teachers with substantial support, to better enable them to build water supply and management topics into their curricula, by:
Provide teacher training that is hands-on, intense, comprehensive, and includes work in the field. A successful training could:
|
Evaluation |
|
Linking Study-Specific BEPs to Essential BEPs
Essential BEPs provide an overview of Best Education Practices derived from education theory and other meta-analysis studies. This table shows which Essential BEPs are highlighted by research about teachers as a target audience. The entire collection of Essential BEPs is available on the Water Outreach website.
Education for: |
The learning experience: |
---|---|
The Individual |
Enables the learner to link new knowledge to their existing knowledge in meaningful ways. Provides a nurturing context for learning, with attention to: cultural or group background and influences, the physical environment, and the use of tools or practices appropriate to learner skills and abilities. Provides opportunities for extended effort and practice. |
The Class or Group |
Is facilitated by quality instructors who have been trained in effective teaching methods and are supported by the program sponsor. Is based on and shaped by some form of needs assessment and use of a planning model. Content and delivery is determined in cooperation with the target audience and stakeholders. Builds environmental literacy, especially for knowledge of environmental processes and systems. Builds from key principles underlying environmental education. Incorporates methods for assessing the value of the experience, especially as it relates to desired outcomes. |
Web-Based Learning |
No relevant research findings |
The Community |
Takes into consideration the community as a whole, including socio-political, economic, historical, and cultural influences. Provides training to increase skills needed to accomplish goals identified by the group. |
Beyond the Community |
No relevant research findings |
Supporting References
Beiswenger, R., Sturges, E. L., & Jones, R. (1991). Water education in Wyoming: Assessing educators’ knowledge of water topics and their use in the elementary curriculum. Journal of Environmental Education, 23(11), 24-29.
Brody, M. (1995). Development of a curriculum framework for water education for educators, scientists, and resource managers. The Journal of Environmental Education, 26(4), 18-29.
Dijksterhuis, O. W. (1996). Environmental education: A tool for coastal management? A study of the Caribbean region. Coastal Management,24(4), 339-353.
Fackler, R. (2003). Kentucky nonpoint source partnerships for excellence in water quality education. Paper presented at the Nonpoint Source Pollution Information and Education Programs Conference.
Fortner, R. W., & Corney, J. R. (2002). Great Lakes educational needs assessment: Teachers’ priorities for topics, materials, and training.Journal of Great Lakes Research, 28(1), 3-14.
May, T. S. (2000). Elements of success in environmental education through practitioner eyes. The Journal of Environmental Education, 31(3), 4-11.
Talsma, V. (2001). The rouge education project: Challenges of implementation. The Journal of Environmental Education, 32(3), 26-30.
Wood, B. B. (2001). Stake’s countenance model: Evaluating an environmental education professional development course. The Journal of Environmental Education, 32(2), 18-27.