Curtis, A., Byron, I., & MacKay, J. (2005) Finding 1

To effectively engage watershed partners and major stakeholders to investigate: landowner issues, awareness of environmental management problems, business development intentions, and potential impact of incentives.

  • Enhance public participation by using a 9 or 10 month process that draws on local knowledge, builds commitment to the research, and builds capacity to interpret and implement key findings.

Continue reading →

Curtis, A., Byron, I., & MacKay, J. (2005) Finding 2

To enhance participatory decision-making, build commitment to research by engaging watershed partners and major stakeholders in answering questions such as: a) what information is needed?; b) how is the information to be collected and analyzed?; c) Who has access to the data and on what conditions?; d) How will the data be used to improve watershed management outcomes?

Continue reading →

Dakins, M. E., Long, J. D., & Hart, M. (2005) Finding 2

How a watershed group is formed may influence its effectiveness.

  • Citizen initiated groups give themselves a high rating on addressing difficult or controversial issues.
  • Government initiated groups give themselves a high rating on receiving assistance during formation.
  • Groups whose membership has been restricted in some way (e.g. property owners only, instead of all interested parties), give themselves a low rating on involving key decision-making groups, timeliness in addressing issues, and overall effectiveness.

Continue reading →